Q1. What is the central argument of the passage?

. The passage repeatedly shifts from what robots are to how humans relate to them. The key move is this: personhood is not discovered but conferred. A is tempting but too prescriptive. The passage does not argue we should grant rights. B overstates. The passage maintains the distinction but questions its relevance. D is exaggerated. Morality is not abandoned, but reconsidered. C captures the philosophical core.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the passage’s argument?

. The passage hinges on this assumption: we infer minds from behavior. If B is true, that assumption collapses. Humans would not be fooled by simulation, undermining the argument that behavior drives recognition. A sounds strong but doesn’t matter much. Even if machines lack consciousness, the argument is about social recognition, not biology. C strengthens the argument. D supports the idea that personhood expands socially. S o B directly attacks the passage’s backbone.

Q3. The author’s tone towards the idea of robot personhood is best described as:

. The passage walks a tightrope. It presents both sides seriously. A is too one-sided. No clear advocacy. B is wrong. The author does not dismiss the idea. D is exaggerated. No alarmism. C fits perfectly. The tone is reflective, weighing consequences without committing fully.

Which of the following statements is most consistent with the author’s reasoning?

. The author shifts the debate from what robots are to what happens if we treat them in certain ways. A reflects the traditional view the passage questions. B contradicts the idea that personhood evolves. D is too extreme. The passage never claims indistinguishability. C aligns exactly with the “ethical consequence” framework in the conclusion.

GRADFLIX — Essays for Curious Minds

RC Passages for CAT, GMAT, GRE, XAT & IPMAT

GRADFLIX is India's premier reading comprehension library for competitive exam aspirants. We publish curated long-form essays across philosophy, psychology, science, history, economics, and culture — each paired with exam-level RC questions modelled after CAT, GMAT, GRE, XAT, and IPMAT patterns.

One Essay, Four Questions, Every Day

We release a fresh essay every day — spanning topics from quantum mechanics and evolutionary biology to political philosophy and literary theory. Each essay comes with four carefully crafted multiple-choice questions that test inference, tone, vocabulary in context, and logical structure. The practice is designed to sharpen not just your score, but your thinking.

Why GRADFLIX?

Most aspirants practise RC with stale, low-quality passages. GRADFLIX changes that. Every essay on our platform is handpicked for intellectual depth, original argument, and linguistic richness — the same qualities the best entrance exams test. Think of us as a reading alternative to Aeon, Smithsonian, Harvard Business Review, Scientific American, and Medium, but purpose-built for exam takers.

Who Is GRADFLIX For?

GRADFLIX is built for CAT VARC aspirants who want to read better, not just practise more. It is equally valuable for GMAT Verbal, GRE Reading Comprehension, XAT Decision Making, and IPMAT English candidates. If you are a serious reader who also happens to be preparing for an exam, GRADFLIX is your home.

Start Reading Today

Browse our library of essays, attempt today's RC set, and track your progress over time. Join thousands of aspirants who read with purpose every day.

When Machines Begin to Deserve

As machines begin to act like thinkers, the line between tool and person blurs, forcing us to rethink what personhood truly means.

A factory floor hums at midnight. Not with fatigue, but with precision. Mechanical arms pivot like disciplined dancers, sensors flicker in silent conversation, and decisions unfold faster than thought. No hesitation, no doubt, no visible conscience. Yet in this choreography of code, a question begins to breathe. If a machine can decide, can it also deserve. The scene feels ordinary and strange at once, because it presses against an idea we have long taken for granted. A tool obeys, a…

RC Questions

Each essay includes four exam-level RC questions for CAT, GMAT, GRE, XAT and IPMAT.

Q1. What is the central argument of the passage?
The passage repeatedly shifts from what robots are to how humans relate to them. The key move is this: personhood is not discovered but conferred. A is tempting but too prescriptive. The passage does not argue we should grant rights. B overstates. The passage maintains the distinction but questions its relevance. D is exaggerated. Morality is not abandoned, but reconsidered. C captures the philosophical core.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the passage’s argument?
The passage hinges on this assumption: we infer minds from behavior. If B is true, that assumption collapses. Humans would not be fooled by simulation, undermining the argument that behavior drives recognition. A sounds strong but doesn’t matter much. Even if machines lack consciousness, the argument is about social recognition, not biology. C strengthens the argument. D supports the idea that personhood expands socially. S o B directly attacks the passage’s backbone.
Q3. The author’s tone towards the idea of robot personhood is best described as:
The passage walks a tightrope. It presents both sides seriously. A is too one-sided. No clear advocacy. B is wrong. The author does not dismiss the idea. D is exaggerated. No alarmism. C fits perfectly. The tone is reflective, weighing consequences without committing fully.
Which of the following statements is most consistent with the author’s reasoning?
The author shifts the debate from what robots are to what happens if we treat them in certain ways. A reflects the traditional view the passage questions. B contradicts the idea that personhood evolves. D is too extreme. The passage never claims indistinguishability. C aligns exactly with the “ethical consequence” framework in the conclusion.

More Science & Technology essays →

When Machines Begin to Deserve