The Bridge That Resonance Did Not Break

The collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge is taught as a lesson in resonance. Two engineers argued in 1991 that the lesson was wrong.

Abhishek Leela Pandey14 Oct 20261 min readGRE2 questions ↓
Minimalist illustration of the 1940 Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse in Washington, showing a suspension bridge twisting in strong winds over water.

On 7 November 1940 the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington twisted itself apart in a wind of about forty miles an hour, and film of the collapse became a staple of physics classrooms. Many textbooks explained it as resonance, with the wind pushing the deck at its natural frequency until the swings grew too large to survive.

In 1991 the engineers Billah and Scanlan surveyed those textbooks and objected. A steady wind has no rhythm to match. What twisted the deck was flutter, in which the motion of the deck altered the airflow around it, and the altered airflow fed the motion in turn. The error persisted for half a century, perhaps because a simple story that looks right is rarely checked by those who retell it. Why it was so rarely checked remains unclear.

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

More in Engineering

Mathematics7 min

Would a Fourth Dimensional Being Be a God?

A thought experiment in higher dimensions asks whether what looks like a miracle might simply be reality viewed from a geometry we cannot perceive.

Abhishek Leela Pandey4 Qs